Protect Our University

Advocacy on behalf of Indiana University's faculty, students and employees

Home
About us
- Our Creative Team
Archives
Get Involved
Contact

Hopefully ACLU Gets Involved – Ben Robinson

ACLU, AUP, Constitutionality, Freedom of Speech, Political Incluence, SEA 202 March 3, 2025

Robinson discusses the constitutionality of SEA 202 and legal involvement of either the ACLU or AUP.

Related posts:

Who Defines the Curriculum: Politicians or Faculty? - Ben Robinson

Background of Expressive Activity - Leslie Lenkowski

Dunn Meadow Events did not Occur in a Vacuum - Leslie Lenkowski

Tags

Chilling Effect (110)SEA 202 (107)Freedom of Speech (88)Expressive Activity Policy (48)Freedom of Assembly (38)Dunn Meadow (36)Political Influence (35)Free Speech (26)Academic Freedom (26)Intellectual Diversity (22)Interview (21)Retaliation (20)Anonymous Complaints (15)Antisemitism (13)Faculty Retention (11)Introduction (11)Candlelight Vigil (10)UA 10 (7)Critical Thinking (7)Activism (7)Halabi Exhibition (7)Intellectual Diversity Requirement (7)Marketplace of Ideas (6)ACLU (5)Expressive Activity (5)First Amendment Rights (4)Freedom of Religion (4)Diversity Equity and Inclusion (4)Dunn Meadow Encampment (4)Constitutional Rights (4)Course Work (4)Protest (4)Board of Trustees (3)Dunn Meadow Protest (3)First Amendment (3)

‹ SEA 202- Reasons for Legislation – Ben Robinson › Expressive Activity – Unconstitutional – Ben Robinson

Recent Posts

No push back after interview – Micol Seigal
A reminder of Iranian Oppression – Hossein Banai
SEA 202 Changes – Kenneth Glenn Dau-Schmidt
Expressive Activity
ACLU Law Suit – David McDonald

© Protect Our University 2025

Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes