Protect Our University

Advocacy on behalf of Indiana University's faculty, students and employees

Home
About us
- Our Creative Team
Archives
Get Involved
Contact

The Treat of SEA 202 – Gustave Wetlsek

Critical Thinking, Diversity, SEA 202 February 24, 2025

Wetlsek discusses the challenges he faces in broadening perspectives as a result of SEA 202. SEA 202 limits his ability to offer value to students.

Related posts:

Loosing an Important Part of the University - Kenneth Glenn Dau-Schmidt

SEA 202 Forbids me to Bring my Research to Class - Micol Seigal

Looking Over our Sholders - Kenneth Glenn Dau-Schmidt

Tags

Chilling Effect (110)SEA 202 (107)Freedom of Speech (88)Expressive Activity Policy (48)Freedom of Assembly (38)Dunn Meadow (36)Political Influence (35)Free Speech (26)Academic Freedom (26)Intellectual Diversity (22)Interview (21)Retaliation (20)Anonymous Complaints (15)Antisemitism (13)Faculty Retention (11)Introduction (11)Candlelight Vigil (10)UA 10 (7)Critical Thinking (7)Activism (7)Halabi Exhibition (7)Intellectual Diversity Requirement (7)Marketplace of Ideas (6)ACLU (5)Expressive Activity (5)First Amendment Rights (4)Freedom of Religion (4)Diversity Equity and Inclusion (4)Dunn Meadow Encampment (4)Constitutional Rights (4)Course Work (4)Protest (4)Board of Trustees (3)Dunn Meadow Protest (3)First Amendment (3)

‹ The Hypocrisy of ‘Intellectual Diversity’ – Gustave Wetlsek › Introduction – Micol Seigal

Recent Posts

SEA 202, Antisemitism, and ‘Intellectual Diversity’ – Michael Weinman
Plan to Stay Engaged – Russ Skiba
Organizing, Groups of Resistance – Heather Akou
Me and Jim Banks – Jeffrey Issac
Rally of April 29 2024- Dunn Madow – Michael Weinman

© Protect Our University 2025

Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes